@Forestofenchantment@PurpCat@EscapeVelo Was Blackberry ever mainstream to begin with? The big three in the 00s I remember were Nokia, Siemens and Sony Ericsson. Samsung and LG were also around as well as some lesser brands like Sagem and Alcatel, but those I think oriented towards budget market and didn't have as much of a robust ecosystem.
@Forestofenchantment@EscapeVelo i think the problem with 2010s laptops is aside from the surface, macbook lines, etc, there wasn't anything "different" that normies had en masse. It was really when laptops began to be cookie cutter design wise, and the Windows 10 era rules didn't help.
@PurpCat@EscapeVelo Same thing happened with mobile handsets (Don't call them smartphones, that's dumb). 2000s had crazy models galore, but once Blackberry and Nokia gave up. You had no choice in cool and unique designs and features from mainstream manufactures. If you want something kewl, you need to go to an obscure company. But at least handsets still have models that do something different. Laptops aren't as fortunate. Besides the Framework line, what laptop manufactures are doing something different? The scourge of globohomo and complacency.
@PurpCat@EscapeVelo x220 is def going to be viewed as an autist laptop from the 2010s. Sandy Bridge CPUs really can't do much these days. If you're using an x220 then tiling window managers or XFCE are mandatory. Tried Gnome on one once and it wasn't fun.
@PurpCat@EscapeVelo I associate the X220 and pre-Lenovo Thinkpads with the 2000s, not the 2010s. The Carbon line is what businesses bought in bulk in the 2010s.
@mint@PurpCat@EscapeVelo Dunno, too young to have used a handset in the 2000s. Making assumptions here. But from a cursory glance, handsets back then were much more varied between manufactures.
@PurpCat@Forestofenchantment@EscapeVelo The thinness trend can't die off soon enough. Just making something that has modern specs, good I/O and some upgradability (like, you know, pretty much every single laptop that was released before AIDS hippie introduced macbook Air) while not being overpriced to hell would already be a huge improvement.
@Forestofenchantment@mint@EscapeVelo the 2000s cell phone market in a nutshell: where you could buy a Blackberry with a low speed data radio, but it's got that nextel chirp in it complete with the chirp button.
if you get an old one and it's passworded, aside from doing security checks at each boot those phones were some of the first to do a wipe after several failed password attempts. But because there was FRP law yet, that wasn't a thing. The idea was protecting your data from theft before protecting the phone from theft because in the 00s Tyrone wasn't stealing your phone to pawn for Fentanyl money.
But then again, the American mobile phone market and what was mainstream was "radically" different than what you see in Russia. See: IDEN phones (vid related, a cell network made by the radio part of Motorola)
@PurpCat@Forestofenchantment@EscapeVelo Russian market was more or less the same as European one, with an added bonus of no carrier locks and later two-SIM models.
@mint@PurpCat@EscapeVelo Chonky phones with small screens are comfy. The limitations force them to be exclusively utilitarian. No PSP emulation here, only Tetris and SMS!
@Forestofenchantment@PurpCat@EscapeVelo Well yeah, but it wasn't just limited to puzzles. Like my first playthrough of Sonic was on officially licensed Gameloft port for phones. Plus NES/gameboy emulation runs just about anywherez including this Java. Also Opera Mini and countless WAP sites, chats and forums.
If the trend towards SoC arm laptops continues, there might come a point where they are both upgradeable and thin. Well, as in you will be able to swap the SoC with a newer one and keep everything else.
@lauralt@Forestofenchantment@EscapeVelo@mint just like with EVs correcting the flaws of old cars like being somewhat repairable, you just know ARM SoCs won't be socketed except in giga high end shit, and I did play around with an ARM server board where it was soldered anyhow before
@lauralt@EscapeVelo@Forestofenchantment@mint but tbh you could see this back in the day with PPC, MIPS, Alpha, and Itanium windows boxes. Every CPU vendor seemingly wanted more control than Intel had over x86 boards and platforms back in the day and even Intel tried this with IA64 (which on one hand was designed to kill AMD and it failed badly).
Maybe, but there's already some standardization with the raspi compute modules and then there are the various firms manufacturing, overpriced, but still standardized carrier boards for nxp based modules.