Notices where this attachment appears
-
The other thing with wignat movements and the like is they're like Nick Fuentes and Milo before that. Nick's not about having a serious movement for example. His whole gimmick is about being an edgelord. That's it. The same goes with Milo, he never built a political career out of his stint of fame but rather blew it even harder by relying on being a shock jock on a single website that was looking for a reason to censor him.
There is nothing any of these groups do that gets them noticed and gives them power of some sort, be it politically, culturally (aside from flyers that just piss off the media with no message that you can't get from one day of browsing Twitter meme pages or dead-end podcasts), or even community wise (with few exceptions).
Sure, some might try to infiltrate the GOP and prove that the GOP is more politically active when trying to kick out "nazis" than they are actually doing anything people voted for them to do (or in blue states, even remotely try to win elections or "secure" them). Some might back candidates and put them forward, even if they crash and burn like Patrick Little (and a few other guys like him IIRC, my memory is blurring here) did, Twitter censoring those candidates still made them kind of a martyr. I know Laura Loomer used her run as proof Twitter was interfering with elections too.
Instead they're too busy infighting and none of them will admit it or dig into why because it's always the feds. It's always the feds and never any other reason. It's not uncommon to hear about how Nick's camp is fighting someone else in that sphere this week.