This might be a silly question, but instructive to think about: All these billions being poured into the “AI” grift, where are they *actually* ending up? Who—or what, in the case of a corporation—is actually *receiving* them?
"Our online spaces are not ecosystems, though tech firms love that word. They’re plantations; highly concentrated and controlled environments, closer kin to the industrial farming of the cattle feedlot or battery chicken farms that madden the creatures trapped within." https://www.noemamag.com/we-need-to-rewild-the-internet/
Yeah, it’s cute that the plagiarism grift machines make funny nonsense. That doesn’t mean it’s suddenly okay to use them and collude in the mass theft and ecological destruction.
My capacious FANNYPACK it's obsolete, you fucking techbro thieves and all your bootlicking henchpeople. Go straight to whatever hell awaits joyless soulless rapacious wastes of space such as yourselves.
It's bloody unconscionable that Covid vaccines and things like Paxlovid are being privatized, after taxpayer money funded research and development. The correct price for a vaccine is $0. The correct price for Covid treatment in this, the fourth year of the pandemic, is $0.
So that Stanford study scaremongering about Mastodon is…interesting. I wonder who paid to commission it and why it doesn’t mention that bad actors are overwhelmingly defederated by the vast majority of instances.
I also wonder why it doesn’t mention the comparable problems with that sort of content on, say, Reddit, which is run by an actual company instead of being a collection of volunteer-run, loosely affiliated instances.
From 2017: “It’s simple: people who engage in sexual harassment or assault are also likely to steal, plagiarize, embezzle, engage in overt racism, or otherwise harm their business. (Of course, sexual harassment and assault harms a business – and even entire fields of endeavor – but in ways that are often discounted or ignored.)” https://hypatia.ca/2017/07/18/the-al-capone-theory-of-sexual-harassment/