@aral also, the larger issue here isn't the FSF, it's the OSI. They're the ones overseeing the open source definition and what constitutes "open source," and they're the ones who have said all licenses with a moral clause are by definition not open source.
@msw@aral it does, but the FSF does not oversee the open source definition. They only oversee the GPL. The OSI holds the open source definition and decides what licenses are open source. They are the ones pushing against moral clauses on principle. That is where the point of friction sits. There is an unresolved ideological conflict here. https://opensource.org/osd