@jeffbyrnes >Reddit is also worth more in financial terms, so there’s that one, too. Hahahahahahaha. No. You can take your mammon and shove it up your greedy arse. @MylesRyden@mmasnick
@aral This is true, in my experience. But also in my experience you, and people like you, want similar echo chambers.
There's nothing really wrong with wanting echo chambers if you ask me. Just so long as you create them yourself and don't use de facto public spaces or subvert any existing private space whose inhabitants are perfectly happy with how it was run previously. @bnmng
@thatguyoverthere >You should be able to make any arguments that aren't outright lies to defend yourself. I don't think I agree. Moderating courtrooms for arguments that might "prejudice the jury" is routine in courtrooms, I thought? Really sleep-deprived though (for the benefit of people who might want to jump in the thread who haven't seen my other post with the privacy settings on)
@thatguyoverthere I don't think he was at risk of having his firearm taken off him. The victim was apparently very slight compared to him. The strongest argument I can think of in the homeowner's favour is that he thought the victim's camera was a gun.
> [Peairs's defense] emphasized that Peairs was an "average Joe", a man just like the jury members' neighbors, a man who "liked sugar in his grits".[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshihiro_Hattori You should not be allowed to make that argument in a court of law.
>turns out she was actually the current president of signal and when I realised that I was like holy shit and started paying attention and appologising for my disrespectful behaviour and as well as commending them for what they have done >i even fell to my knees and appologised xD and then I told the rest of the class to shut up as they were just ignorant frogs compared to who was standing in front of them The most cringe and bluepilled thing I ever heard. Found in a security room on XMPP.