Notices by 🇺🇲 watson :dealwithit: (watson@freeatlantis.com), page 46

11) Sounds like Trump Attorney 1 was being tested by Trump...
Trump Attorney 1 is Evan Cocoran, Trump Attorney 2 is probably Christina Bobb but that's from memory, I haven't gone through to confirm details. #TrumpIndictment

10) So Trump called Attorney 1 on the phone to get him to confirm that he was coming the next day to review the boxes for classified information.
Wanna bet those wires were tapped & Trump made a perfect phone call? #TrumpIndictment

12) Trump made sure to meet with Corcoran. Anyone really believe Trump instructed him to "pluck out" the bad documents?
Bobb must be attorney 3, she signed the certification without doing the search based on Corcoran i's word that he searched it. #TrumpIndictment

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1667191521882386434

#TrumpIndictment
13) Wonder why Corcoran didn't want to sign his own life away based upon his search?
Because he wanted someone else to blame for it...
We get a vague listing of the documents, I'll have to continue this at a later time.
https://twitter.com/DawsonSField/status/1667241876968054797

Remember when Chuck Schumer said the deep state would 'get even' with Trump?
Seems relevant now with all the leaks and indictments...

#TrumpIndictment
Yes, the sitting president can authorize himself to classify, de-classify, possess, transport, etc. any document because the president is the highest authority of the Executive Branch as per the Constitution. This is true whether you think it's normatively good, bad, or neutral
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1667258080357240837

#TrumpIndictment
https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1667279083217223680

look at the chyron. this is where we are as a civilized country.
https://twitter.com/KarliBonnita/status/1667266191604305920

thread 🧵 by Liz Harrington

1) Jack Smith Has a History of Failed Prosecutions & Seriously Flawed Cases

Smith was instrumental in the DOJ’s part in the Lois Lerner IRS scandal targeting conservatives

3) Jack Smith’s biggest fan is Andrew Weismann, the ringleader of another corrupt failed Witch Hunt, the Mueller Hoax

2) Jack Smith is a hatchet man who was unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court in his case against Bob McDonnell. His case with no legal basis against John Edwards failed

Smith is hiding who is on his staff

His wife is a Biden donor who made a Michelle Obama documentary

4) The Deputy AG Lisa Monaco is a longtime Obama loyalist and architect of the Russia Collusion Hoax

She’s also a driving force behind the unequal justice and corrupt prosecutions of Jan 6 protesters

https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1667278451823484929

He is shaking as he speaks. He’s so nervous.

He has always overplayed his hand in the cases he’s handled because he’s an emotional partisan activist.

His Kosovo case is falling apart and his own witnesses there are now claiming he and his team at The Hague faked CIA officials to intimidate them.

#TrumpIndictment

MARK R LEVIN:

Here's the Espionage Act.  When you look at the various section titles, and beyond, you can see that the nature of this statute has nothing to do with an application to a president or former president.  Otherwise, you can imagine how the statute can be used to set up former presidents with prosecutorial techniques.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-37

https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/1667279949055574017

3) Jack Smith is relying on 18 U.S. Code 793, a law created in 1948 intended to stop contractors to the Defense Dept from stealing, selling, or copying U.S. defense system secrets, or patents on defense products. 
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
The premise of 31-counts [each an individual document] pertain to “National Defense Security.”  The subsequent six counts are predicated around the claimed 793(e) violations.

5) or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it,

4) The DOJ is not, repeat NOT, arguing a classified docs case. The entire legal framework is centered around documents they define as vital to the defense security of the United States. EVERYTHING is predicated on this 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) violation:
18 U.S. Code § 793 (e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance,

6) or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it.
Despite the verbose language in the indictment, a key element of Lawfare, the case is weak. The prosecutors know it.

A Visual Example of Joe Biden Caught in the Act of a 18 U.S. Code § 793 Violation According to Special Counsel Jack Smith
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/06/09/a-visual-example-of-joe-biden-caught-in-the-act-of-a-18-u-s-code-%c2%a7-793-violation-according-to-special-counsel-jack-smith/
https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1667305092830076930