@thatguyoverthere@amerika your questions are rhetorical. They aren't really questions at all, but arrogant presumptions. Capitalists carry an inherent inability to see that there is any alternative to capitalism. They don't even realize that humanity managed well long before the disaster of capitalism struck us. They enter any discussion about true alternatives with a strong bias against them.
@thatguyoverthere@amerika no, you, like most people see capitalism as the only possible way of organizing human society, and forget that humanity existed long before that disaster struck us. There are many others. Your inability to see that makes it near impossible to explain true alternatives to you. I have shown you how completely straightforward one alternative is.
@thatguyoverthere@amerika I reject the very idea of "market incentives"... It will come because there is a true need for it, in a dynamic society with a population trained to do critical and inventive thinking. The worst problems will come during the transition and implementation. There will always be challenges, of course, but that is true of any society. We certainly have enormous, life-threatening trouble today brought on by capitalism.
@thatguyoverthere@amerika There are those that will confuse it with the 15 minute city, I guess. There are important differences, though. The autonomy. The public transport and fast trains making any city within reasonable distance easily accessible. Solar, wind, the plants and any truly environmentally friendly energy. Yes, I do want everything essential to be accessible within walking distance, and produced locally. Luxuries will be harder to access, which is good.
@thatguyoverthere@Sigma@wjmaggos@amerika@FourOh-LLC most pre-civilization hunter/gatherer societies were non-hierarchal. Of course, there is the dunbar number that might come into play with higher numbers of people. My solution is a network of truly autonomous communes described on my substack blog.
@thatguyoverthere@Sigma@wjmaggos@amerika@FourOh-LLC generally speaking, we should not try to transfer relations in nature to human realities. That is true, also when agreeing that human beings are animals, or one species of animal. As stated, nature is a vast variety of differences, in all areas.
@thatguyoverthere@Sigma@wjmaggos@amerika@FourOh-LLC hierarchy in animals is not normal. It does exist. It is a distraction, though. As stated, the human hierarchy is a gross deception, an invention of civilization. Read about the archeology behind the science in my article tumor.
@amerika I disagree with that, of course. The system is wrong, but it is as far from leftist it is possible to come. Capitalism and the hierarchy are wrong. In other words, the very idea of inequality. In a truly great society, there is no contradiction between the individual and the group.
One thing is crucial to keep in mind. Racism is systemic. That means it doesn't exist in a vacuum. It exists by design in a given society. So, those spitting slurs are actually not the most crucial here. "Everyday racism" is. White supremacy is.
Most people are way too lenient against racism. We need to take a true stand against it. It is long overdue. So, no, it isn't a process. Either you are fiercely anti-racist, or you support racism.
Anyone wanting radical people to cooperate with racists supports the establishment. Racists are all establishment. The term "Maga communists" is a gross misnomer. Partisan is good. There is way too little partisan people in the world.