Notices by Johnny Peligro (mischievoustomato@5dollah.click), page 5
-
real
-
i'd munch it
-
i'd lick her underboob
-
uoh choco
-
no need to feel left out, ill plow u too
-
im not gonna do this dance-with-the-tsundere stuff bruv
-
sure pal
-
i need to plow a femboy
-
tfw no gf that uses twintails
-
🤦♂️
-
it's good for storage, but you still need to decompress the files to play the game, in the case of repacking
that said, some files can be transparently compressed using linux+btrfs and some games do get smaller
-
i need a mentally ill wife or boywife ngl
-
gnome
-
trump supporter is one of the tamest things
you have like different flavors of fascism in there, lmao
-
i support both
anyway, you can literally get anyone to support anything depending on the word you use, i remember other stuff mentioning this with a study or something
-
@coolboymew god i wish i was dennis
-
close to upstream, rather clean (doesnt customize stuff like how ubuntu does), usually supported by 3rd parties (vscode, google chrome etc), good package repos, secure boot support, offline upgrades support, up to date packages but also stable, dnf supports downgrades (dnf downgrade <pkg>).
Also, I do like RH
That said, nothing is perfect:
- SELinux is a bit annoying, but I have learned to do some stuff more proper to not annoy it
- To get good download speeds I have to add some text to dnf.conf, and also edit the repo files using sed to use swedish servers (mainly ftp.acc.umu.se). Changing repositories is much easier in debian based systems, also in arch. This also applies to rpmfusion
- Regarding download speeds, dnf also doesn't seem to do multiple connections when you are downloading a single package, which makes downloading vscode take quite a bit of time.
Anyway, I'm quite happy on fedora currently. Funny how I went thru a big journey to end back here.
I'm a bit worried about the flatpak-focused future. But I assume that if they go flatpak-only, it means that I might be able to give flatpaks a shot again...
-
there was a reddit thread that had good info about that stuff, but i ended up agreeing with the RH side
-
no, because it's not really closed source, you can still get the source thru making a free account
Plus, rebuilders like alma, rocky and so on ate up RH's business which was not good for em, and I'm partial to RH because they fund a lot of work that goes for Linux on the desktop.
-
I *also* remember a point about how Oracle, SUSE and some others put work into circumventing the red hat stuff, while SUSE keeps SLES in a similar way to how RH keeps RHEL source code
Statistics
- User ID
- 49937
- Member since
- 11 Sep 2023
- Notices
- 821
- Daily average
- 2