@lain It's a pretty good all-in-one-just-works-package for people using webmails, plus it's pretty well-known as for now, but the lack of SMTP really sucks. Most people don't care, but still, I used to use it for stuff that I was not comfortable using my domain mail for, but now I use GMail for that (yeah, I know there are some something-privacy alternatives, but really, if you want a special E-Mail address that is normie-friendly-but-like-a-person-in-an-office enough, GMail is probably the best option
@xerz >Right, so nuking civilian infrastructure (including refugee camps)
Jabalia is a 50k town that has a status of a refugee camp only because it was established as such in AFAIR 1950s. And is it a stronghold of Hamas, and given Hamas' methods of the usage of civilian buildings, it is not illogical to at least take into consideration that it is likely the infrastructure and some buildings there could be used by Hamas. Do we know for sure that all of the buildings that were intentionally struct were such? No, of course not, but to claim that something was actually a war crime, we need to know for sure.
>a few of the folks are (para)military Unfortunately, it's not a few of the folks, it's the current real government of Gaza, authoritarian, sure (because although the election in 2006 were democratic, the later changes of the status of power in the region were less so), but still. And regardless of that – the usage of civilian infrastructure in Gaza by Hamas must lead to a lot of civilian casualties if Hamas should ever be destroyed. Which could be also a strategy of Hamas to gain sympathy (I use subjunctive here, because although it's suggested quite widely, I haven't seen a definitive proof that this is a plan of Hamas and not just a coincidence).
Is it wrong? Sure, but does it really lead to the conclusion that the guilt lies in the hands of Israel here?
>and not war crimes Well, actions can be right or wrong, or at least controversial, but for something to be specifically a war crime it has to stick to the definitions. Destroying civilian buildings that are in the military use (+ the collateral, because if you bomb a military building in an urban environment, it's hard not to destroy something else as a result) is not a war crime. The deliberate destruction of purely civilian buildings is.
>I’ll just let time pass and evidence speak up for itself. And that's a really reasonable approach in the age of Twitter's (etc., you get the idea) manipulated and biased quasi news.
The perfect system of financing roads doesn’t exis…
Parking rules are not, however, the limit of what keeps cars out of Tokyo. Arguably, an even bigger reason is how infrastructure has been funded in Japan. That is, by the market, rather than directly by taxes. In the 1950s and ’60s, much like Europe and the United States, Japan began building expressways. But unlike in Europe and America, it was starting from a considerably more difficult place. In 1957, Ralph J. Watkins, an American economist who had been invited to advise the Japanese government, reported that “the roads of Japan are incredibly bad. No other industrial nation has so completely neglected its highway system.” Just 23 percent of roads were paved, including just two-thirds of the only highway linking Osaka, Japan’s historical economic hub, to Tokyo.
But unlike America, the idea of making them free never seemed to cross politicians’ minds, probably because Japan in the postwar era was not the world’s richest country. Capital was not freely available. To build the roads, the national government formed corporations such as the Shuto Kōsoku-dōro Kabushiki-gaisha, or Metropolitan Expressway Company, which was formed in greater Tokyo in 1959. These corporations took out vast amounts of debt, which they had to repay, so that the Japanese taxpayer would not be burdened. That meant that tolls were imposed from the very beginning. The tolls had to cover not just the construction cost, but also maintenance and interest on the loans. Today, to drive on the Shuto Expressway costs from 300 to 1,320 yen, or $2.50 to $11 for a “standard-size” automobile. Overall, tolls in Japan are the most expensive in the world — around three times higher than the level charged on the private autoroutes in France, or on average, about 3,000 yen per 100 kilometers ($22 to drive 62 miles).
ДАННОЕ СООБЩЕНИЕ (МАТЕРИАЛ) СОЗДАНО И (ИЛИ) РАСПРОСТРАНЕНО СРЕДСТВОМ МАССОВОЙ ИНФОРМАЦИИ, ВЫПОЛНЯЮЩИМ ФУНКЦИИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА, И (ИЛИ) РОССИЙСКИМ ЮРИДИЧЕСКИМ ЛИЦОМ, ВЫПОЛНЯЮЩИМ ФУНКЦИИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТАhttps://naruciakk.eu/I can communicate in stan1293, stan1295 (maybe even in lowe1387 a little bit, in Danzig dialect), poli1260 and in nucl1643 (there is still need for some progress though).#nobotRaucht die guten Danziger Zigaretten🇪🇺 🇮🇱 🏴 🇭🇰