Notices by djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com), page 44

When he was on Viva/Barnes, he made a very wise statement about how he did take the jab, but no one really knew or could know what the right decision was … something of that nature – essentially admitting he could be wrong but being okay with that.

But then a while later he went off on that crazy rant on one of his viewer’s comments (I think he called her a “Cunt” … and honestly he may have just made up the comment) .. and more recently even Barnes said on the Viva/Barns podcast about how he likes Scott, mentioned how Scott had been on the show, but also talked about how he was going off the rails; pretending he always supported x when he didn’t.

I dunno. I never liked his coffee time show (I don’t like talking heads in general … like the American Vagabond guy is interesting, but I hate listening to his podcast cause it’s just him talking for an hour .. that’s just annoying … same with Carl/Sargon of Akkad way back before he did Lotus Eaters .. having a co-host guest is always better) … and more and more I just dislike some of the amplified rants and triads. I still like the Dilbert toons, but I could give a shit about Adam’s personal views … they’re not well thought out to me and irrelevant.

healthcare

Isn’t euthanasia in the top 5 leading causes of death now, with doctors encouraging hundreds of people to end their lives instead of continuing treatment?

But yea, everything else for America and Candanavia is fairly accurate. I had a lot of hope for the Trucker Protest. I hope we see something positive with the uprising in Brazil, but I know it’s very unlikely.

At some point, The West will buckle … and it won’t matter if you’re in America, Canada, UK, France or Australia … when the global empire falls, it’s going to take everything with it.

I mean, yea you’re always going to get people creating structures to try to put them ahead. That’s the nature of … everything. You see those structures forming and fighting with each other in nature. It’s kinda inevitable.

I can totally see where you’re coming from. It would be nice if we all joined small collectives that worked with each other .. but think about it … if one of those small collected started growing, certain people would rise to the top and try to move things gradually to benefit a smaller selectorate of supporters. (Animal Farm style)

I guess my concern is that small collectives wouldn’t scale to the sizes needed to be really efficient and give us so many of the benefits we have today (e.g. shooting communication machines into space).

You could make an argument, maybe we shouldn’t be in space and our technology is making us worse now. That’s valid, but it’s all a tradeoff. We live longer, and have all this great tech, but we’re getting more health problems and our tech is being used to control people. Everything is a tradeoff… what side humanity should be on is subjective to you values.