From what I understand, the Davos group is the successor to the Bilderberg group. Or the same group, really, just meeting in Davos instead of the Bilderberg hotel. But yes, there are people above the WEF. The WEF itself was created by the Rockefellers, and they also created the WHO and the UN. They themselves are connected to the Rothschilds, that are themselves connected to the Venetian black nobility, that itself may be connected to the Committee of 300.
I think I have seen that about GIFs in general, regardless of size. We're in the 2020s for JavaScript, people are fine with that slowing everything down, but suddenly if you use GIFs you have to pretend that we're back in 90s internet speeds.
900 KB would be a pretty big one, so you wouldn't want too many of those on every page (though you would need fucking 50 of them to get even close to the size of a bunch of websites), but it's fine. It's just like any other image, you don't want a ton of gigantic PNGs in your website either.
My mentality is that anything that was fine in the early 2000s is DEFINITELY fine now. It worked back then, and it works now, on much faster connections. If you use small GIFs, you can use a massive amount of them with no negative effect on performance.
And you can use small ones, because one thing that people don't get nowadays is that not everything has to be as big as possible. Most images don't really benefit from being in a huge resolution, and some of them, like buttons on a website, don't benefit from not being as small as possible.
You can see it in art nowadays, how there are so many pictures in really simple art styles, that have no reason to be even 1 MB in size, but are like, 5, or 10. Why does a stick figure need to be drawn in "4K"? It doesn't, it's a stick figure, it's a simple thing, it doesn't have the amount of detail that would require that.
Also, you see this in video. Why do people record videos that are mostly static images in 60 FPS? Or even 30, even that is overkill. If you are going to record a game running at 60 FPS, then record it at 60 as well, but if you're doing a tech video, then why not do 20? Or maybe even less? There's just not enough motion to justify that many frames.
And it applies to resolution as well. Have you ever noticed how people that do tech videos are constantly making their font size bigger during the video, so people can see what they're doing? Are they slow in the head? Why don't people just lower the fucking resolution?! It makes things larger, and easier to see without fullscreen, AND it makes the file sizes smaller, so it's easier to archive things, or even host them yourself!
My Libsixel video is 68.3 MB for over 27 minutes. And I don't even know how to do the best possible compression, I just did the default ffmpeg one. And the frame rate could have been lower (my gaming videos, on the other hand, are 60 FPS, but the lowest resolution that I can set X to on my system, which is 640x480). But I have downloaded videos before, that were mostly static images, that were like, a GB in size, and not even as long.
Ridiculously wasteful. And this trend of larger and larger file sizes gives corporations more power, by making things artificially harder to host! It also makes it harder for people to download things and keep them. You would think that tech people in particular would care more about efficiency, especially the MUH MEMEMALISM people. https://social.076.moe/url/74764
I looked it up, and it doesn't seem to be necessarily true. One article says that George Soros didn't attend, but apparently Klaus Schwab did. Another one says that Bill Gates never had the intention to attend, so he didn't "pull out".
Pretty much every warmonger in history used "fighting for peace" as an excuse. Of course, what they really mean is "when everyone that opposes me is either dead or in shackles, then I won't cause any more wars".
And of course, that just gets more people to question it. The fact that people are "not allowed" to question it is probably the #1 reason why they do it. Anyway, people in places like that could just say things like "of course I don't question the holocaust, it sounds like a great idea, sounds like it could take care of the problem, but manufacturing and wasting a shitload of bug spray is a very impractical way of doing it".
By the way, it's always worth reminding people that there are actually retards out there that think that Putin is going to save them from the Jews. https://social.076.moe/url/71700
I remember that I showed someone a picture of Klaus Schwab wearing those clothes to someone about a year ago, and he didn't believe that it was real and thought that surely, it had to be edited. Was that you? I think it probably wasn't.
I bet that some current year soydevs would actually have the audacity to say that you shouldn't use GIFs because they slow things down. Meanwhile they use 50 MB (which is 6.25 times bigger than Super Mario 64) to get black text on a white background, on top of requiring enormous web browsers that also have no features because they were all removed, so you have to add them all back through extensions, and install more extensions to replace all the broken shit that doesn't work right. It's awful.
Speaking of games, this game does the internet better than the internet, and I don't have it, but I fucking bet that it runs better than actual websites do on actual browsers. https://youtube.076.ne.jp/watch?v=dHyiXLRETNc
'If anyone else does it, it's called "carpet bombing innocent civilians".'
And even in those cases, it's generally "terrorists" that they armed, that did it so that NATO could blame it on somebody else, as an excuse to invade.
"why should it be impossible today?"
Because if people make things simple, then anyone will be able to make a browser and corporations like Google and their branches (like Mozilla) will have no excuse to exist anymore, and then it will be harder for psychopaths to hoard massive amounts of resources and power, and life will be better. And they can't have that, that's not acceptable.
I used to be like that. When I was a kid, I only cared about games and anime (and I played games about anime and looked for anime about games). Back then I wasn't aware that other people weren't obsessed with everything, but looking back, I can tell that when I was like, 9, I annoyed the few kids I talked to because I was way more obsessed with specific games (and still am to this day) than they were about anything.
Anyway, my power level grew so big that it spread from one thing to another, and also, thinking way too much about specific things make me tend to think way too much about everything, and then I got into philosophy and philosophizing as well. Anime and games got me to use computers, and learn more about them over time, and eventually games got me into electronics in general, because of the hardware side of things, and influence from other people that are really into games. So, I got into technology in order to enhance hobbies that I already had, basically.
The internet in general made me more well-rounded, because I watched people that were interested in things that I liked, but they were also always into other things as well, and I absorbed their interests over time. My tastes also broadened a lot over time as I tried different things, so I like pretty much every genre at this point.
Pretty damn based. I don't know if it's possible for me to be in group chats considering the way that I communicate, though. You have seen how gigantic my posts get. That's how I communicate all the time (except in real life, where I don't communicate, because I fucking hate almost everyone that I have ever met).
Imagine trying to do that in a group chat, though, and trying to reply to multiple things at once. Not possible. Also, XMPP does have group chats as well. But IRC is the most classic and boomerpilled, for that purpose, so you can't go wrong with it. https://social.076.moe/url/67591
The only point of desktop environments like that is to ease people into it. It's kinda nice to have one so you can still do basic things while you learn how to use the terminal and all that. But really, my position is that the entire desktop and window management paradigm that became standard is really fucking bad.
Sometimes I use a floating window management again because of curiosity, and holy shit, are they annoying. Windows never spawn where they are fucking supposed to, it's ridiculous. It's especially bad with more than one monitor, and I used a laptop hooked up to an external monitor, so I pretty much always have two.
My position is the same as before. Tilers like StumpWM (what I use myself), Sdorfehs/Ratpoison and Notion are the best. You create frames (can be done automatically in whatever size you want), and windows spawn in those frames. It's like a terminal multiplexer, or Emacs (including EXWM, which is just using Emacs as your window manager, which I only don't do because Emacs is single-threaded, and it's unreliable). Though StumpWM has dynamic tiling as well, so you can use it like dwm if you want to. It does everything, really.
After that, dynamic tilers. If these window managers didn't exist, I'd probably use dwm or something like it, and add a limit to the number of windows in the slave stack, and make windows replace the currently-selected one (and hide it) when the limit is reached. Should be easy to do, and it would absolutely demolish any floater.
The only thing that I don't like about any window manager is that the bars are all kinda shit. You really have to make your own from scratch to have something good. Desktop environments have better bars, particularly XFCE, but those don't tend to work too well with the window managers I like.
I have developed a sixth sense that can tell when a sponsorship is coming and skip it before a single word is said, and also accurately click right to the end of it.
Anyway, I just remembered the best sponsored video. https://youtube.076.ne.jp/watch?v=CFzjBka-jB4
You'll probably like it, it's good, and it's also a demonstration of the creative liberty that comes with telling sponsors to fuck off and shove their money back where it came from and where it belongs, right up a Jew's ass.
Sponsorships inevitably mean losing the freedom to do whatever the fuck you want and to have fun, and it really turns making videos right back into the shitty slaviewagie job that people wanted to avoid in the first place.
And of course, they are all scams. If they have any positive effect at all, it's that they inform you about what not to buy. Whenever people buy something because of an ad, they are paying for that ad and not for actual quality. All ads are scams.
Stability is something that I heard complaints about from multiple people. Apparently the graphical package installer thing conflicts with pacman, or something? Absolutely retarded. Why not just make a GUI front-end for pacman? It's not even hard. It's not even harder, it's EASIER! Anyway, I used Arch for years and it never broke, it's very stable. Probably the most stable distribution that I have ever used along with Devuan. Least stable would be Ubuntu and everything based on it. Never actually used Manjaro, though.
The whole stability meme is basically the inverse of reality. Arch is more stable than Ubuntu, and so are even Gentoo and Funtoo (not sure if you used source-based distributions). All of these distributions "for beginners" are unstable. You can go to DistroWatch and read people's reviews of the dumb shit that happened to them. Not the case with a distribution like Devuan. And I don't remember Arch's reviews, but generally, with a popular "install your own shit" distribution like that, nothing goes wrong unless you do something stupid, because there is so little that can go wrong.
A program can break, that happens, but the system keeps working, and you generally have a good idea of what is wrong because you have installed it and set it up yourself. You don't really get the entire thing falling apart for no reason like you get on desktop environments and "beginner" distributions. People meme that distributions like that break all the time... I don't know where the fuck that comes from.
I look back at when I used Windows, and it's weird to even think about. Constant errors and crashes, and the system slowing down over time for no reason. That just doesn't happen anymore (other than the system freezing from running out of memory, which is not something that any OS handles well anyway). My systems have been stable since they have been installed, and that is probably because I only used distributions like Devuan and Arch as my daily drivers. I only really used distributions like Ubuntu to learn, on secondary computers, so they broke, but it didn't matter.