Using AI to create a face from crime-scene DNA & then running it through face recognition tech isn’t only “junk science,” EFF’s Jennifer Lynch told @WIRED - “It’s very dangerous, because it puts people at risk of being a suspect for a crime they didn’t commit.”
https://www.wired.com/story/parabon-nanolabs-dna-face-models-police-facial-recognition/
Conversation
Notices
-
Electronic Frontier Foundation (eff@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jan-2024 05:04:44 JST Electronic Frontier Foundation -
Felipe 🏴♾️⛧ (felipe_b@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jan-2024 06:12:50 JST Felipe 🏴♾️⛧ @eff @WIRED
Why Mathematicians Won't Help Cops
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXitS_PMyFQIn conversation permalink Attachments
-
Abel M'Vada (abelmvada@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 23-Jan-2024 18:11:14 JST Abel M'Vada @eff @WIRED "Cops Read Philip K. Dick Novella—and Learn All the Wrong Lessons From It"
In conversation permalink -
AfroScribble (afroscribble@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 10:14:44 JST AfroScribble @eff @WIRED this is actually several orders of magnitude worse than polygraphs, because polygraphs actually measure *some* physical stimuli. This is on the level of asking a psychic to divinate a changeling from a scrap of DNA except people pretend it's scientific because it's attached to a hallucinating computer.
Thanks, I hate it!
In conversation permalink
-