Conversation

Notices

1. SlicerDicer (slicerdicer@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 20:50:31 JST SlicerDicer
   Anyone see what’s wrong with this chart?
   
   The chart is correct mind you.
   • Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: (thatguyoverthere@shitposter.club)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 20:50:28 JST Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:

     in reply to

     • Recovered Expert
     @RecoveredExpert @SlicerDicer what if I'm incredibly interested in climate but not satisfied with the quality "climate science" (or really much modern science in general)?
   • Recovered Expert (recoveredexpert@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 20:50:30 JST Recovered Expert

     in reply to

     @SlicerDicer the problem with those who still don’t see the problem isn’t information or being unable to comprehend that info. It’s due to lack of interest. Disinformation and the amount of that plays a role too, but IMHO mostly as an amplification factor.

     😞

   • Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: (thatguyoverthere@shitposter.club)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 23:48:10 JST Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:

     in reply to

     • Recovered Expert
     @SlicerDicer @RecoveredExpert I don't have the bandwidth for this one today, and I think neither of us is likely to walk away with a different perspective anyway, but my point was simply that assuming people who have different opinions think the way they do because they lack interest or don't care (or worse are too stupid to care or understand) is a bad way to try and convince anyone that you are right. It is a good virtue signal though.
   • SlicerDicer (slicerdicer@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 23:48:11 JST SlicerDicer

     in reply to

     • Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think:
     • Recovered Expert
     @thatguyoverthere @RecoveredExpert @SlicerDicer Well then fuck the science, let’s leave that out. Do you think this is cool?
     Disinformation Purveyor :verified_think: likes this.