Conversation

Notices

1. Ardainian Hebrew Israelite (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 12:49:12 JST Ardainian Hebrew Israelite

   • Vivi Nella Verita :Debian_logo:
   • Mr. Bacon
   • kuro-chan
   • rees
   @verita84 @rees @Tony @sun_eater
   Imagine thinking drunk sex with your wife is rape. That's as gay and Clown World as anything.
   • luithe likes this.
   • Ardainian Hebrew Israelite (ardainianright@detroitriotcity.com)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 14:32:55 JST Ardainian Hebrew Israelite

     in reply to

     • Vivi Nella Verita :Debian_logo:
     • Mr. Bacon
     • kuro-chan
     • rees
     @rees @Tony @sun_eater @verita84
     Even if you assume your wife is not property any non-retarded judicial framework would start with the assumption of consent until proven otherwise for married folk.
   • Vivi Nella Verita :Debian_logo: (verita84@poster.place)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 14:32:56 JST Vivi Nella Verita :Debian_logo:

     in reply to

     • Mr. Bacon
     • kuro-chan
     • rees
     @ArdainianRight @rees @Tony @sun_eater
     
     That's the logic being used for some reason
     Ardainian Hebrew Israelite likes this.
   • rees (rees@breastmilk.club)'s status on Friday, 25-Aug-2023 14:32:56 JST rees

     in reply to

     • Vivi Nella Verita :Debian_logo:
     • Mr. Bacon
     • kuro-chan
     @ArdainianRight @Tony @sun_eater @verita84 it's rape just like beating your wife is assault. you can make the argument that neither of these things are bad because she's your property (I disagree) but it's still what it is by definition