Conversation

Notices

1. nixCraft 🐧 (nixcraft@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Aug-2023 07:13:06 JST nixCraft 🐧

   Are you using AI to generate content? Read this. AI-Generated Works Aren’t Protected By Copyrights, Federal Judge Rules. If you use AI to write a book, music, video, code, or anything else, it is not copyright protected. Judge said protection is only afforded to works created by humans.

   https://www.billboard.com/pro/ai-generated-creative-works-cant-be-copyrighted-judge-rules/

   • Eugene Teplitsky (eugeneteplitsky@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Aug-2023 07:36:45 JST Eugene Teplitsky

     in reply to

     @nixCraft As I already replied to a few similar warnings on the topic, please consider the critical nuances of the ruling:

     According to the ruling and commentary, only fully AI-created works with no substantial human input are ineligible for copyright. Consider the amount of human input that goes into a typical generative process: the prompt itself, the selection and curation, inpainting, outpainting, post-processing, etc..

     So I would urge calm on the matter. Most AI creatives should be fine.

   • Terminhell (terminhell@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Aug-2023 09:04:59 JST Terminhell

     in reply to

     @nixCraft I could see an argument for the work belonging to the LLM creators instead. I'm not for that either, but it's kind of like when a child creates something or is eligible for large sums of money, it defaults to the parents/trust.