Conversation
Notices
-
"People on my side won't be hurt by AI art because people on my side don't make art"
RT: https://poa.st/objects/494529a8-804f-4605-a76c-3255ae495b57
-
@doctorsex @WoodshopHandman people like owen cyclops are an example that RW artwork exists and is supported.
It's "conservatives" that don't support an art culture
-
@sickburnbro what
-
@WoodshopHandman RW people don't care about AI art not because RW people don't make art, but because all the companies that control entry into making a real living from art are controlled by progressives, and they intuitively understand it will hurt their enemies much worse than them.
-
There's definitely still an aspect of petty resentment or whatever
-
@WoodshopHandman What is owned by libtards isn't art, but all the commercial entities which parasite on art.
-
Lots and lots of ebegging in the gay twitter art sphere. These are not people with monolothic financial backing, generally. These are people who would rather live in poverty doing something they enjoy than have a stable living. It's a risk-attraction that does not really naturally intersect with most RW ideology.
-
@sickburnbro The point being that rightoids won't into art if they can't make money off of it, then? Do you think that every libtard artist on twitter is getting funded by blackrock or something?