Untitled attachment

Notices where this attachment appears

1. pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Friday, 25-Oct-2024 05:10:52 JST pistolero
   @Waerloga @DiamondMind @3T @NonPlayableClown @charlie_root @dcc @djsumdog @ins0mniak @meso @mint @moth_ball @xianc78 "Slowing the rate of increase by 21%" is not quite the same as stopping it; I certainly wouldn't call it "slashing". Chernobyl stopped the active fusion pretty quickly after it started but it's forty years out and there's still enough decaying radioactive matter to make the place unlivable.
   
   So the rate of increase is down 21%. The population of Canada as of the 2021 census was 37m, and the population as of now is estimated at 41.3m and that's a 10% increase. Per https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fertility-rate-canada-why-1.7338668 , the fertility rate is 1.26, well below the replacement rate of 2.1. ("Canada recorded its lowest-ever fertility rate for the second year in a row in 2023, according to Statistics Canada, at 1.26 children born per woman. It now joins the ranks of "lowest-low" fertility countries, including South Korea, Spain, Italy and Japan.") But the population increased by 10.4% in three years. How do you figure that happened?
   
   So is this "slashing" or just "That's enough for now"?
   
   > Me: Dayum nigga…who you is? Trump- deau or Trudeau?
   
   Trudeau. He still views you as cattle. Good luck.